Sofy vs Leapwork: Which ERP Test Automation Platform Is Right for You?

If you’ve narrowed a D365 or SAP testing shortlist to Sofy and Leapwork, the decision comes down to one question: do you want a test artifact your team owns and maintains, or agents that re-derive validation on every run with nothing to maintain? 

Sofy is built on the second model. You describe a business process in plain language and a module-specific agent generates the test, executes it, validates the outcome at the data layer, and adapts when your ERP changes. No flow to redesign, no generated code to reauthor.  Leapwork is a capable platform with a real Microsoft relationship and hundreds of enterprise customers. This page sets out where the two genuinely diverge, in architecture, not feature lists.

So this isn’t going to be a takedown. It’s a direct, specific comparison of where Sofy and Leapwork actually diverge, in architecture, not just feature lists, written for the person who’s narrowed their shortlist to these two and needs the real differences, including the ones that don’t show up in a sales deck.

Sofy vs Leapwork: Architecture, Not Just Features

Here’s the distinction that actually matters and rarely comes up in a demo: Leapwork and Sofy solve the “no coding required” problem in fundamentally different ways.

Leapwork removes the coding requirement by producing test artifacts a human still owns and edits, whether that’s a visual flow assembled from blocks, or Playwright TypeScript generated from a recording or a prompt. Either way there is a script or a flow sitting in your repository that someone reviews, reauthors, and repairs when it breaks. Leapwork’s own positioning describes this as the value: what it produces is real code an engineering team can review and extend.  Sofy removes the artifact. There is no flow to redesign and no generated code to reauthor, because the agent re-derives how to validate the business outcome each time it runs. When a release wave restructures a workflow, nothing needs opening.

Sofy removes the test-design step entirely. You describe the scenario in plain English, “process a purchase order over the approval threshold and confirm it routes to the finance approver”, and an AI agent generates and executes the test, discovering the relevant screens and fields on its own. When the application changes, the agent adapts its approach before the test would have failed, rather than waiting for a human to open the flow and fix it.

Leapwork at a Glance: What It Does Well

Leapwork is a visual, no-code test automation platform built around a flowchart-style test designer, you assemble pre-built blocks (click, type, verify, wait) into a visual sequence rather than writing code. It holds strategic partner status with Microsoft for Dynamics 365 and Power Platform, including a public endorsement from Mike Ehrenberg, Technical Fellow and CTO of the Dynamics 365 Applications Group, and ships D365-specific “intelligent adaptors” designed to reduce breakage from Microsoft’s One Version update cadence.

Where Leapwork Users Report Friction

The same review platforms that praise Leapwork’s ease of use also surface a consistent set of complaints worth knowing before you buy, not after:

• Limited mobile testing support. Reviewers specifically flag this as a gap. Leapwork is built for web and desktop applications; if your ERP ecosystem includes companion mobile apps, a warehouse scanning app, a field service app, an approvals app, you’re looking at a second tool.
• Network setup and occasional slowness. Multiple reviewers mention friction getting Leapwork’s execution infrastructure configured correctly, and intermittent performance issues once it’s running.
• No published pricing. Every pricing page for Leapwork, including their own, says “contact sales.” That’s common for enterprise software, but it also means every evaluation starts with a sales cycle instead of a number, and per independent comparisons, Leapwork’s cost tends to run higher than comparable no-code competitors, reflecting its broader enterprise feature set.
• A maintained artifact either way. Whether Leapwork produces a visual flow or generated Playwright TypeScript, the output is a test asset your team owns, reviews and repairs over time. That’s a genuine benefit for teams who want that control, and a recurring cost for teams who don’t — the most important architectural fact for this comparison, covered next.

Leapwork made test creation easier. Sofy removed the artifact that has to be maintained, that’s the actual gap between the two.

Feature-by-Feature: Sofy vs. Leapwork Compared

Leapwork Alternative for Dynamics 365 Testing

D365 is where this comparison gets sharpest, because it’s the environment Leapwork has invested the most in, and where the difference in approach shows up fastest in practice.

Leapwork’s D365 adaptors are built to survive Microsoft’s continuous One Version update cadence better than generic locator-based tools, that’s a real, meaningful advantage over older automation approaches. But it’s still adaptors reducing breakage in flows a human designed. When Microsoft ships a release wave that restructures a workflow rather than just moving a field, someone still needs to open the affected flows and redesign them.

Sofy’s Dynamics 365 agents are trained per module, Finance, Supply Chain, Sales, Business Central, and validate business outcomes (did the journal post correctly, did the purchase order route to the right approver) rather than replaying a visual sequence. When a release wave changes a workflow structurally, the agent re-derives how to validate the same business outcome under the new flow, rather than needing the original design edited.

Pricing: What Leapwork Doesn’t Publish

Neither Leapwork nor Sofy publishes list pricing, both are enterprise sales-led. The practical difference worth knowing before your first call: independent comparison sites consistently note Leapwork’s pricing runs higher than comparable no-code competitors, which several reviewers attribute to its broader enterprise governance feature set and cross-technology coverage (D365, SAP, Oracle, Citrix, Mainframe all from one platform).

The more useful comparison than a list price is total cost of ownership: how many hours does your team spend per release cycle maintaining flows versus letting agents adapt on their own? That number, tracked over one or two real release cycles, tells you more than either vendor’s initial quote.

Choose Leapwork when…

Visual control is non-negotiable.
If your QA team insists on explicitly designing, reviewing, and owning every test step in a visual flow, rather than letting an agent interpret scenarios, Leapwork’s model delivers that direct, hands-on control.

You need broad tech coverage, not just ERP depth.
Testing across D365, SAP, Citrix, and Mainframe from one platform? Leapwork’s wider technology footprint is a genuine advantage if ERP isn’t your only (or primary) target.

Choose Sofy.ai when…

You want tests that write themselves.
If your team values describing what to test in plain language and letting an agent generate, execute, and maintain the scenarios, Sofy.ai eliminates the visual assembly work entirely. It is built for teams that trust AI to handle the implementation details.

ERP depth beats cross-platform breadth.
When your world is D365, Business Central, F&O, or CE, and you need deep, native ERP intelligence rather than a generic automation layer, Sofy.ai’s specialized focus delivers faster time-to-value and more resilient tests against complex ERP workflows.

Maintenance overhead is the enemy.
Visual flows break when UI shifts. Sofy.ai’s self-healing approach adapts to application changes automatically, which matters if your ERP receives frequent updates and your QA team does not have bandwidth to constantly repair brittle scripts.

If your priority is autonomous, ERP-native testing that scales without proportional human effort, Sofy.ai is the more natural fit. If you need to own every click visually or span non-ERP technologies equally, Leapwork retains the edge.

Why you should shift to Sofy?

Teams moving off Leapwork aren’t discarding their test coverage, they’re re-describing it. Existing flows document exactly which business scenarios matter, which makes the migration a translation exercise rather than a blank-page rewrite: each flow becomes a plain-English description of the same scenario, which Sofy’s agents then execute autonomously. Most teams run both platforms in parallel for a release cycle or two, retiring Leapwork flows as agent coverage catches up, rather than a hard cutover.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Sofy a good Leapwork alternative for Dynamics 365?

Yes, particularly for teams whose main frustration with Leapwork is ongoing flow maintenance after D365 release waves, or who need mobile test coverage alongside D365 testing, an area Leapwork users consistently flag as limited. Sofy’s Dynamics 365 agents validate business outcomes per module rather than replaying a designed visual flow, which reduces the maintenance Leapwork’s flowchart model still requires.

What’s the main difference between Sofy and Leapwork?

Leapwork replaces code with a visual, no-code flowchart that a human still designs and maintains. Sofy replaces the design step itself, you describe a test scenario in plain English and an AI agent generates, executes, and adapts the test autonomously, without anyone building or editing a flow.

Does Leapwork support mobile app testing?

Leapwork’s core strength is web and desktop application testing; verified user reviews specifically note limited mobile testing support. Teams needing both ERP and mobile app coverage from a single platform often find this a gap worth addressing separately.

The Bottom Line

Leapwork earned its place on your shortlist honestly, strong Microsoft relationship, genuine no-code accessibility, and a track record with hundreds of enterprises. If you want visual control over exactly how tests are built, or need equally mature coverage across D365, SAP, Citrix, and Mainframe from one platform, it remains a strong choice.

If what’s pulling you toward alternatives is the maintenance that visual flows still require after every release, or a mobile testing gap Leapwork itself doesn’t fully close, that’s the specific problem Sofy’s agent architecture was built to solve.